The next hypotheses finished the model that is theoretical

facebook banner

The next hypotheses finished the model that is theoretical


1806 self-report questionnaires had been administered in 101 classrooms from additional and schools that are high Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in November 2007. Approval to conduct the study ended up being acquired through the regional college inspectorate and through the principals of each and every college contained in the test. Moms and dads had been informed through the instructors therefore the pupils’ permission has also been required for taking part in the study. Even though questionnaire aimed to encompass a number of activities and habits, both on line and offline, a componenticular part ended up being aimed at problems linked to online-offline relationship.

The Internet for 3 hours on a school day (Std on average, boys in our sample use. Deviation =1.856) and 5.44 hours on a day weekend

(Std. Deviation=3.311), while girls utilze the internet for 2.77 hours for a college and 4.61 on a weekend time day. Additionally, the teens have now been making use of the online world for 2.88 years on average (Std. Deviation=2.123). Nearly half them work with a cam once they talk on IM, men being less selective than girls (girls utilize the cam with a few buddies, guys with practically anybody inside their list – the distinction is significant, r=. 143, p Teenagers’ Actions and Interactions Online in Central and Eastern Europe. Potentials and Empowerment, dangers and victimization. Cluj: Cluj University Press.

Com?a, M., Sandu, D., Toth, A., Voicu, M., & Voicu, O. (2006). Public Advice Barometer. Perceptions about Mass-Media. Bucharest: Open Community Foundation.

Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online dating sites and dating: the application of the net to fulfill partners that are sexual. Qualitative Heath Research, 18, 268-280.

Daneback, K. (2006). Sexuality and love on the web. Unpublished dissertation that is doctoral Goteborg, Goteborg University.

Davis, C. M., & Bauserman, R. (1993). Contact with sexually explicit materials: an mindset change viewpoint. Annual report on Intercourse analysis, 4, 121-209.

Davis, C. M., Hart, G., Bolding, G., Sherr, L., & Elford, J. (2006). E-Dating, identity and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, danger and community culture. Sociology of wellness & disease, 28, 457-478.

Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Handling impressions online: Self-presentation processes within the on the web dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2). Retrieved Mai 2, 2009, from http: //jcmc. Html

Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K.J., & Wolak, J. (2000). On the web victimization: a written report from the youth that is nation’s. Alexandria, VA: Nationwide Center for Missing & Exploited Kids.

Fleming, M.J., Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K.A., & Morrison, S. (2006). Security on the internet: Adolescents’ exposure and safety on line. Youth & Community, 38, 135-154.

Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B., & Heino, R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of expected future interaction, self-disclosure, and recognized success in internet relationship. Communication Analysis, 33, 152-177.

Goodstein, A. (2007). Completely Wired: What Teens and Tweens Are Actually Doing On Line. Ny: Saint Martin’s Griffin.

Groof, S. De (2008). And my mama said…The (relative) parental impact on concern with crime among adolescent kids. Youth & Society, 39, 267-293.

Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Web well-being and use in adolescence. Journal of Social problems, 58, 75-90.

Harter, S. (1985). Competence being a measurement of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive style of self-worth. In R.E. Leahy (Ed. ), the growth for the personal (pp. 55-121). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Heim, J., Brandtz?g, P.B., Kaare, B.H., Endestad, T., & Torgersen, L. (2007). Children’s use of news technologies and psychosocial facets. Brand Brand New Media & Community, 9, 425-454.

Hodkinson, P., & Lincoln, S. (2008). On the web journals as digital rooms?: young adults, identification and individual area. Young, 16, 27-46.

Internet World Stats (2009). Online use in European Union Table of internet surfers in eu, March 31, 2009. Retrieved May 26, 2009, from http: //www. Htm

Knox, D., Daniels, V., Sturdivant, L., & Zusman, M. (2001). University student utilization of the Web for mate selection. University Student Journal, 35, 158-160.

Korbin, J. E (2003). Kids, childhoods, and physical physical violence. Yearly Reviews of Anthropology, 32, 431-446.

Kraut, R. E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web paradox: A social technology that decreases social involvement and emotional wellbeing? US Psychologist, 53, 1017-1032.

Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media usage and closeness that is relational long-lasting friendships: Interpreting habits of multimodality. Brand New Media & Community, 10, 547-565.

Lenhart, A. (2005). Protecting Teens On The Web. Washington, DC: The Pew Web & United States Lifestyle Venture.

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teenagers, Privacy and Online social networking sites: How Teenagers manage their on line Identities and private information into the chronilogical age of MySpace. Washington, DC: The Pew Web & United States Lifetime Venture.

Livingstone, S. (2002). Young adults and Brand Brand New Media. London: Sage Publications.

Livingstone, S. (2003). Children’s utilization of the online: Reflections for the research agenda that is emerging. Brand New Media & Society, 9, 147-166.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Using opportunities that are risky youthful article marketing: teens’ usage of social networking web web sites for closeness, privacy and self-expression. Brand New Media & Community, 10, 393-411.

Mesch, G.S. (2009). Personal bonds and Internet pornographic visibility among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 601-18.

Meyer, A. (2007). The ethical rhetoric of youth. Childhood 14(1), 85-104.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2001). Danger factors for and impact of online sexual solicitations of youth (brief report). Journal of this United states Medical Association 285, 3011-3014. Doi: 10.1001/jama. 285.23.3011.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003a). Victimization of youth on the Internet. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 8 (1/2), 1-39.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003b). The publicity of youth to undesirable intimate product on the world wide web. A survey that is national of, effect, and avoidance. Youth & Society, 34, 330-358.

Mitchell, K.J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2004). Victimization of youngsters on the web. In J.L. Mullings, J.W. Marquart & D.J. Hartley (Eds.). The Victimization of Kids: Emerging Issues (pp. 1-39). Nyc, NY: The Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press.

Moscardelli, D.M., & Divine, R. (2007). Adolescents’ concerns for privacy with all the Web: an analysis that is empirical of and relationships with privacy- protective actions. Family and customer Science analysis Journal, 35(3), 232-253.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006a). Adolescents’ experience of intimately explicit product online. Correspondence Analysis, 33, 178-204.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006b). Analysis note: specific distinctions in perceptions of Web communication. European Journal of correspondence ihookup, 21, 213-226.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2007). Whom actively seeks casual dates on the net? A test associated with payment plus the entertainment hypotheses. Brand New Media & Community, 9, 455-474.

Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2008). Adolescents’ experience of intimately explicit Web product, intimate doubt, and attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration: will there be a web link? Correspondence Analysis, 35, 579-601.

Rosen, L.D. (2006). Adolescents in MySpace: identification development, relationship and intimate predators. (Executive summary). Retrieved December 17, 2008, from http: //www.

Smith, A. (2007). Teenagers and Online Stranger Contact. (information memo). Washington, DC: The Pew Online & American Lifetime Venture.

Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Breaking up reality from fiction: an assessment of misleading self-presentation in on the web profiles that are dating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.

Tynes, B.M. (2007). Web security gone crazy?: compromising the academic and emotional great things about online social surroundings. Journal of Adolescent analysis, 22, 575- 585.

Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the web. Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Correspondence Analysis, 35, 208-231.

Walsh, W.A., & Wolak, J. (2005). Nonforcible Internet-related sex crimes with adolescent victims: Prosecution dilemmas and results. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 260-271.

Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered away, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated interaction and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds. ), Handbook of Interpersonal Correspondence (3rd Ed.). (pp. 529-563). London: Sage Publications.

Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2002). Close on line relationships in a sample that is national of. Adolescence, 37, 441-455.

Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Undesired and desired publicity to online pornography in a nationwide test of youth internet surfers. Pediatrics, 119, 247-257.

(1) The pattern may well not connect with SNS pages, where teens tend to add ”friends” merely to enhance their online status.

Event Date:

Event Location:

Ticket Buying Link: